This 2255 motion filed by William
Baskerville is entirely about ineffective assistance of counsel. At
every turn in this case, Mr. Baskerville’s attorneys exerted
minimal effort, often completely ignoring his requests for specific
investigation. These attorneys were like slugs going through the
motions and frequently failed to bother with even the most obvious.
The appeal attorney was equally ineffective.
Herman and Kayser have now both taken the side of the government to cover up their incompetent representation of
Mr. Baskerville. Both have fabricated statements in certifications
claiming that they made an attempt to challenge the government's
evidence on the chain of custody issue of the drug evidence in the
case. The court ordered both attorneys to produce proof
of this challenge, but they failed to do so.
The government has pursued numerous
inconsistent theories in this case, which are tied to multiple lies
and discrepancies in testimony. If the information that we have today
had been available early in the case, William Baskerville most
definitely could not have been convicted.
I am including a link to William
Baskerville’s 2255 Motion. There is such a high level of failure in
every possible way that to discuss one or two issues here wouldn't scratch the surface. Mr. Baskerville is representing himself in the
case and after you read it, you will understand why.
No comments:
Post a Comment