The US criminal justice system and all of its many paid participants are nothing but trash, with a few exceptions of course. In the case of Paul Bergrin and case of William Baskerville, which is connected only by the murder of Kemo Deshawn McCray, the only judicial exception is the Honorable US District Judge William Martini. There are no government or prosecution or FBI exceptions. Defense attorneys are another subject and it's a mixed bag!
I know exactly what they all did to William Baskerville and so does William. Neither one of us was born yesterday. The entire evidentiary hearing was one big setup with the goal of easily disposing of his many claims in the 2255 petition. To know this, one must only look at the November 2018 court Opinion that gave William the evidentiary hearing. The Opinion whittled his long list of claims down to what amounted to a few minor points. The Opinion filed in PACER late on October 9, 2019, easily chipped away those few claims William was allowed to address in the evidentiary hearing.
At the conclusion of the just filed Opinion, Judge Sheridan threw William Baskerville a bone. The issue is that William is not a dog and has no interest in their decaying bone. And don't think it is not easily noticeable that William was, once again, cheated out of presenting witnesses in his defense. The November 2018 Opinion whittled the witnesses down to only two: Hakeem Curry and Rakeem Baskerville. It was relatively simple to knock off these two witnesses in the hearing, but the reasoning behind knocking down the witness list to these two men is suspect to say the least.
I did not speak openly about the court's November 2018 Opinion for reasons that should be obvious. William had won an evidentiary hearing, which is supposed to be a major accomplishment in our lousy, sorry excuse for a justice system. At that point we were unsure if it was a setup to get rid of all of William's claims or a real attempt to find truth. Now we know.
Just let this post sit. I'm too angry to discuss this whittling exercise care of the US government and the court right now and have been since the night of the 10th when I discovered the Opinion in PACER. This post is to let the perpetrators of this long game of injustice know that I know, and that William knows. Everything will be addressed soon.
Nothing has changed in the William Baskerville case and as a matter of fact, the government, US District Judge Sheridan, and the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals panel have now all stated that it doesn't matter if Anthony Young was the shooter or not and it doesn't matter if Young lied in testimony in four (4) federal trials. Imagine that ---- the freakin' truth doesn't matter! It literally doesn't matter that the government created a false narrative and LIED throughout four federal trials!
Welcome to the US, where the truth is irrelevant!
It's like dealing with the flimflam man! It's a major con job on all fronts, and let's face it... If you have to hide behind convoluted language and assert that false narratives are facts, constantly reinforcing your government colleague's obscure statements as you go along, THERE'S SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOUR CASE! You're a con artist, the flimflam man, and worst of all, you are swindling lives, stealing decades, cheating life.
Another thing about these District court rulings and appeals court opinions... every single one that I read assumes the government's version of the entire case as facts. They have the pretense of arguing about the one point you're allowed to appeal and then say but this fact, but that fact, but the next fact and on and on... but the facts are not facts at all. They make it sound like you are making some tiny point in an ocean of FACTS. As with the statement that AY lying is irrelevant, because there's this fact, that fact, lots of jailhouse informants fact, Manson made a tiny mistake surrounded by hundreds of facts.
Anyway, I'm not sure how to address this. Even concerning the Johnnie Davis ID of Lattimore at Newark PD after the shooting... Davis was stating that he didn't know if the guy in the picture was the shooter or not. He just knew the shooter had dark skin and dreadlocks. DITTO on every single point discussed, including Lou and the attorney visiting Davis and obtaining a statement... they turned it into something nefarious on behalf of the government, when it was not any such thing. Lou was a retired FBI SA, not some street clown!
Just saying that I don't know how to address the constant nonstop twists of reality by judges and the government attorneys. They do it for each other.. judge x said this fact etc... when judge x was just parroting the government attorneys. It's a sorry shit scam.
